Today's hottest deals

Asus GR8 II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus GR8 II  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GR8 II-K
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170120
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateNov 10 '21 at 23:55
Run Duration300 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
1151p, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 105
2-Core 208
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 393
51% 384 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$144
Asus(1043 85BB) 3GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2022 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (63 fps cap detected)
50.6% Above average
Lighting 62
Reflection 63
Parallax 63.8
50% 62.9 fps
MRender 63.3
Gravity 63.8
Splatting 59.9
51% 62.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV512TBN 512GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MA020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 228 200 163 124 152 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 372
Write 289
Mixed 352
SusWrite 178
67% 298 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 61.9
4K Mixed 33.4
111% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 290
227% 314 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 75%
Great: 97%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
223GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 102 104 102 99 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 113
Write 90.4
Mixed 20.9
SusWrite 99.4
58% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
72% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 75%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB
74GB free, PID 0820
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 56 54 46 35 45 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 132
Write 132
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 47.2
115% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.5
220% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 53%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
164GB free, PID 0900
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 57 54 46 35 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Read 131
Write 130
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 47.5
109% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
35% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 52%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
65GB free, PID 0800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 58 55 47 35 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 75.8
Write 75.9
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 48.1
75% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 54%
External USB3.0 DISK00 8TB
4TB free, PID 0567
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 7.9 8.1 9.3 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.36% Terrible
Read 20.6
Write 63.4
Mixed 40.6
SusWrite 10.6
50% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
56% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 9.36%
Great: 75%
External USB3.0 DISK01 8TB
7.5TB free, PID 0567
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 32 31 28 25 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 143
Write 160
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 29.5
122% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 90%
External USB3.0 DISK03 8TB
813GB free, PID 0567
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 13 13 17 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
25.1% Poor
Read 111
Write 123
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 15.3
96% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 75%
External USB3.0 DISK04 8TB
1TB free, PID 0567
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 13 13 17 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Read 82.4
Write 134
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 15.3
96% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 74%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0900
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 40 36 26 18 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
8.98% Terrible
Read 11.5
Write 19.9
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 29.1
29% 19.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
14% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 8.98%
Great: 53%
ASMT ASM1156-PM 4TB
565GB free, PID 55aa
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 37 36 31 28 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 120
Write 103
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 33.8
83% 69.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
102% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 72%
ASMT ASM1156-PM 3TB
46GB free, PID 55aa
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 37 35 31 28 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 131
Write 66.6
Mixed 23.1
SusWrite 33.8
71% 63.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
34% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
72.4% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 22.5
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 25.2
SC Mixed 21.8
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GR8 II Builds (Compare 373 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

System: Asus GR8 II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $244
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback