PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 26.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8H61-M LE (all builds) |
Memory | 12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130918 |
Uptime | 1.4 Days |
Run Date | Jun 23 '22 at 00:28 |
Run Duration | 157 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 7% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
78.3%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
55.8%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 76 49 64 75 39 MB/s
|
26.8%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$30
419GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 194 195 196 194 196 MB/s
|
112%
Outstanding
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 28 MB/s
|
15.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown Atermiter9.A01LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
52.6%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 163x |
Core i5-2400Intel $40Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 110x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 85x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 158x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 82x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 36x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $208 |