Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics71.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive50.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 29 '21 at 09:29
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
80% Very good
Memory 66
1-Core 141
2-Core 267
84% 158 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 771
79% 637 Pts
64-Core 1,014
63% 1,014 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 80%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$234
Nvidia(10DE 21C4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.9% Very good
Lighting 89.2
Reflection 88.9
Parallax 83.4
73% 87.2 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 79.5
Splatting 70.5
70% 88.6 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingmax 480GB 480GB
237GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN4763
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 13 25 24 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 458
Write 16.9
Mixed 30.6
SusWrite 30.3
28% 134 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 15.4
4K Mixed 3.3
93% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 17.8
DQ Mixed 29.8
42% 83.1 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 109%
External USB3.0 DISK00 8TB
6.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 9.1 1.1 4.7 8 5.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 198
Write 169
Mixed 116
SusWrite 5
149% 122 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 2.1
217% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 75%
External USB3.0 DISK01 8TB
7.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 140 177 151 140 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 193
Write 168
Mixed 111
SusWrite 156
207% 157 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 1.6
198% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 90%
External USB3.0 DISK02 8TB
6.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 0.5 2.8 4 4.9 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 44
Write 73.4
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 11.1
49% 37 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 73%
External USB3.0 DISK03 8TB
7.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 140 177 151 140 154 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 196
Write 181
Mixed 90.2
SusWrite 156
204% 156 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 1.7
200% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 75%
External USB3.0 DISK04 8TB
5.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 7.7 0.8 4.1 6.6 4.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
41% Average
Read 190
Write 179
Mixed 132
SusWrite 4
158% 126 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 2.1
216% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 41%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.2% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 14.5
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 12.1
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,990 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $348
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback