Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte B450 AORUS M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte B450 AORUS M  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '20 at 20:28
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 86.4
1-Core 114
2-Core 227
80% 143 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 694
70% 566 Pts
64-Core 896
56% 896 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 18.8
Parallax 21.4
18% 20.6 fps
MRender 25.9
Gravity 23.4
Splatting 17.3
18% 22.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 240GB-$74
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1203AB
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 475
Write 445
Mixed 396
98% 439 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 76.4
4K Mixed 41.2
138% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 250
210% 304 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 92%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
114GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 50 50 50 50 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Read 47.5
Write 49
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 49.6
32% 44.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
120% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 43%
Seagate Desktop 8TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 149 147 147 149 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 122
Write 146
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 146
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.6
245% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 93%
External USB3.0 DISK01 8TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.1 0 0 0 8.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Read 32
Write 31.8
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 1.5
30% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.6
194% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 90%
External USB3.0 DISK03 2TB
611GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 4.4 4.3 4.5 4.4 4.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
9.42% Terrible
Read 34.5
Write 25
Mixed 31
SusWrite 4.1
30% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.42%
Great: 80%
External USB3.0 DISK02 5TB
669GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.1 0 0 0 8.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 31.5
Write 36.8
Mixed 35
SusWrite 1.5
35% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 0.5
306% 3.3 MB/s
DQ Read 0.3
DQ Write 9.2
DQ Mixed 0.7
338% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 54%
External USB3.0 DISK00 3TB
761GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 34 34 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 7.3
Mixed 12.2
SusWrite 32.2
26% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
19% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 45.2
MC Write 42.4
MC Mixed 37.1
119% 41.6 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 41.5
SC Mixed 32.5
96% 33.7 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 114%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS M Builds (Compare 8,262 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 AORUS M - $87

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $372
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback