Asrock Z77 Extreme6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme6  (all builds)
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '19 at 10:05
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 101
2-Core 194
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 502
51% 413 Pts
64-Core 506
31% 506 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Asus(1043 859B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 150
Parallax 130
104% 136 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 133
Splatting 111
98% 121 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
683GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 766 313 103 327 468 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 116 99 84 93 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 13.5
Write 72.1
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 100
38% 52.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 113%
ASMT ASM1156-PM 8TB
137GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 24 24 24 23 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 88.6
Write 125
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 23.6
102% 76.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 13
4K Mixed 0.7
469% 4.87 MB/s
DQ Read 0.3
DQ Write 13.8
DQ Mixed 0.8
498% 4.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 69%
ASMT ASM1156-PM 3TB
2TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 178 190 190 188 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 186
Write 150
Mixed 69.1
SusWrite 185
193% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
48.6% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme6 Builds (Compare 770 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme6 - $236

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $705
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback