ADD TO PC
BUILD

Intel CRESCENTBAY

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Intel CRESCENTBAY (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150829
Uptime	5.3 Days
Run Date	May 06 '20 at 19:41
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5500U 73,655 User benchmarks, average bench 46% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	62% Good	Memory 84.7 1-Core 92.3 2-Core 167 68% 115 Pts	4-Core 227 8-Core 242 31% 234 Pts	64-Core 241 15% 241 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz) 231,498 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Intel(8086 1616) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	5.4% Terrible	Lighting 5.5 Reflection 7.77 Parallax 6.94 4% 6.74 fps	MRender 8.24 Gravity 5.13 Splatting 11.8 7% 8.38 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.4% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSMS180S3128GJ 128GB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 75 74 39 63 51 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	53.5% Above average	Read 67 Write 298 Mixed 130 SusWrite 71.3 32% 142 MB/s	4K Read 36 4K Write 58 4K Mixed 32 126% 42 MB/s	DQ Read 93.1 DQ Write 267 DQ Mixed 77.4 89% 146 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 80%
Seagate ST1000LM 035-1RK172 1TB 3,232 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 635GB free Firmware: SDM2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 92 93 87 88 87 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	41.4% Average	Read 52.8 Write 92.5 Mixed 48 SusWrite 90 52% 70.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 0.4 149% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 70%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB 4,473 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1TB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Read 29 Write 23.8 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 18.8 32% 24.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 52%
ASMT ASM1156-PM 8TB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1TB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	22.8% Poor	Read 32 Write 24 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 18.8 32% 24.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 1 194% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung 2x8GB 17,576 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.8% Above average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 20.8 MC Mixed 17 53% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 11 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 72.3 55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical CRESCENTBAY Builds (Compare 195 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel CRESCENTBAY

CPU
Core i7-5500UIntelBench 46%, 73,655 samples	22x
Core i5-4200UIntel $281Bench 43%, 64,450 samples	18x
Core i7-4500UIntel $393Bench 50%, 39,249 samples	13x

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	81x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	50x
HD 6000 (Mobile)IntelBench 6%, 5,021 samples	20x

SSD
SSD 128GBHoodiskBench 69%, 496 samples	9x
KingFast 256GBBench 72%, 7,147 samples	6x
MT-128 128GBBench 61%, 290 samples	5x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	12x
99U5428-018.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 26%, 6,120 samples	10x
CT102464BF160B.M16 1x8GBCrucialBench 26%, 4,731 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback