PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 67.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock X99 OC Formula (all builds) |
Memory | 22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20180406 |
Uptime | 0.6 Days |
Run Date | Jun 11 '19 at 14:03 |
Run Duration | 156 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
|
72.9%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
EVGA(3842 1999) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
67.2%
Good
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$96
379GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 153 165 135 94 96 MB/s
|
62.2%
Good
|
|||
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
930GB free
Firmware: 1B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1452 1534 1455 1571 1627 1617 MB/s
|
318%
Outstanding
|
|||
ASMT ASM1156-PM 2TB
1TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 21 20 20 20 MB/s
|
16.6%
Very poor
|
|||
ASMT ASM1156-PM 4TB
84GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.6 MB/s
|
10.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
87.9%
Excellent
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 21x |
Core i7-5930KIntel $116Bench 80%, 34,039 samples | 13x |
Core i7-5960XIntel $189Bench 80%, 15,468 samples | 5x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 7x |
RTX 3080Nvidia $709Bench 187%, 424,051 samples | 5x |
GTX 980-TiNvidia $449Bench 79%, 214,030 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 106% - Outstanding | Total price: $372 |