Today's hottest deals

Asrock B360 Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics60.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B360 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180525
Uptime10.9 Days
Run DateJun 25 '19 at 18:35
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Memory 94.3
1-Core 119
2-Core 246
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 671
72% 573 Pts
64-Core 702
44% 702 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 8618) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.7% Good
Lighting 76.6
Reflection 74.5
Parallax 65
62% 72 fps
MRender 69.6
Gravity 69.9
Splatting 70.3
57% 69.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$105
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,845
Write 1,211
Mixed 1,110
307% 1,388 MB/s
4K Read 52.7
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 65.1
218% 73.9 MB/s
DQ Read 965
DQ Write 1,209
DQ Mixed 991
774% 1,055 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$50
52GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 138 165 160 105 120 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 156
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 134
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 113%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
4GB free
Firmware: FP1R
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 173
Write 167
Mixed 55.8
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
329% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$50
12GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 57 60 58 58 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 129
Write 93.5
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 64.9
67% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 113%
Hitachi HDN726050ALE614 5TB
93GB free
Firmware: APGNW7JH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 194 196 202 189 196 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 161
Write 165
Mixed 74.2
SusWrite 196
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
181% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 102%
Great: 116%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$75
178GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 179 161 177 167 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 92.5
Write 146
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 172
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.6
197% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$75
62GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 146 149 157 154 151 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 91.5
Write 104
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 149
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.5
205% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 90%
ASMT ASM1156-PM 2TB
676GB free, PID 55aa
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 6.6 5.2 0.4 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
6.2% Terrible
Read 37
Write 5.8
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 3.3
14% 14.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.2%
Great: 78%
ASMT ASM1156-PM 2TB
1GB free, PID 55aa
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 106
Write 37
Mixed 38
64% 60.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
118% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x16GB-$28
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 29.1
92% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 34.7
SC Mixed 26.9
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 59.1
68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B360 Pro4 Builds (Compare 712 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B360 Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $351
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback