Acer Aspire TC-705

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire TC-705  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-705
Memory5.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150611
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 02 '19 at 02:42
Run Duration346 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$132
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 113
2-Core 222
79% 140 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 541
57% 454 Pts
64-Core 566
35% 566 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
Sapphire(174B 249A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Lighting 13.5
Reflection 13
Parallax 10
11% 12.2 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 14.3
10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$46
804GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 79 94 101 71 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 144
Write 145
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 78.1
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
204% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$85
884GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 161 159 158 161 163 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 108
Write 82.3
Mixed 62
SusWrite 160
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST1000DM003-1CH162 3TB
776GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 178 174 175 179 179 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 174
Write 147
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 176
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 104%
WDC WD10 EADS-00M2B0 1TB
111GB free, PID 1018
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 38 40 42 42 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.7% Very poor
Read 38.7
Write 40.2
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 39.8
52% 37.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 20%
ST500DM0 02-1BD142 500GB
33GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 39 39 40 40 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 38.5
Write 38.2
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 39.4
49% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
67% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 18%
WDC WD50 01AALS-00L3B2 500GB
10GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 47.7
Write 46.5
Mixed 42.5
58% 45.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
74% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 35%
ST3000DM 008-2DM166 3TB
781GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.2 1.8 0.9 0.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 208
Write 166
Mixed 91.7
SusWrite 0.7
138% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 74%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB
121GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 65 65 66 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 91.8
Write 86
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 65.5
94% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 43%
Audio Player 4GB
4GB free, PID 7108
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 0.7
Write 0.2
Mixed 0.5
0% 0.47 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 0% Great: 3%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1KNG/8G ACR16D3LU1MNG/4G 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
43.5% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 12.7
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 14.6
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-705 Builds (Compare 552 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-705

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback