Biostar B75MU3+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics23.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar B75MU3+  (all builds)
Memory19.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120508
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateDec 13 '17 at 17:59
Run Duration505 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 88.9
1-Core 103
2-Core 202
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 395
53% 394 Pts
64-Core 397
25% 397 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.1001
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Lighting 28.5
Reflection 31.5
Parallax 35.8
23% 31.9 fps
MRender 28
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 37.6
25% 29.8 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
639GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 161
Write 125
Mixed 92.9
94% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 0.56
4K Mixed 0.29
59% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 149
Write 143
Mixed 126
104% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 2.26
4K Mixed 0.35
116% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 109%
SD CARD 4GB
4GB free, PID 7108
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.45% Terrible
Read 9.14
Write 5.23
Mixed 6.98
8% 7.12 MB/s
4K Read 3.88
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.02
16% 1.31 MB/s
Audio Player 4GB
3GB free, PID 7108
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
2.74% Terrible
Read 6.91
Write 3.68
Mixed 4.46
6% 5.01 MB/s
4K Read 3.93
4K Write 0.003
4K Mixed 0.004
15% 1.31 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 2.74%
Great: 3%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 8502 1866 CL10 Series 8502 1600 CL9 Series 8502 1866 CL10 Series 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
60.3% Good
MC Read 21
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 19.9
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 18.7
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75MU3+ Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar B75MU3+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback