Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 20 '22 at 07:51
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 94.1
2-Core 154
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 454
48% 386 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$150
Nvidia(10DE 1F82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44.1% Average
Lighting 55
Reflection 56.8
Parallax 51.8
45% 54.5 fps
MRender 63.8
Gravity 50
Splatting 45.9
43% 53.2 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
RevuAhn_850X1M256GB 256GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0815B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 300 291 288 292 288 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 467
Write 365
Mixed 314
SusWrite 301
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 56.1
4K Mixed 30.1
101% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 196
174% 261 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
199GB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 100 100 97 100 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 80.4
Write 61.1
Mixed 67
SusWrite 98.3
57% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$85
181GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 73 76 73 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 65.5
Write 63.6
Mixed 44.8
SusWrite 74.3
46% 62.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
120% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
54.4% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 17.2
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 17.7
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 24" 1280 720 ACB049B QHD270
Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $154

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $501
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback