LORD GM965 Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 2.76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive15.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardLORD GM965 Series  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141022
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 19 '18 at 22:45
Run Duration1291 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 3.20GHz
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
2.76% Terrible
Memory 4.48
1-Core 3.7
2-Core 3.4
3% 3.86 Pts
4-Core 5.9
8-Core 8.2
1% 7.05 Pts
64-Core 8.7
0% 8.7 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 2.76%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Q-180 180GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.74.00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
15.2% Very poor
Read 118
Write 79.5
Mixed 131
24% 110 MB/s
4K Read 8.13
4K Write 6.28
4K Mixed 2.96
19% 5.79 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 90%
Audio Player 4GB
0GB free, PID 7108
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
0.4% Terrible
Read 0.87
Write 0.8
Mixed 0.64
1% 0.77 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 0.009
4K Mixed 0.008
2% 0.11 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.4%
Great: 3%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
5.37% Terrible
MC Read 1.9
MC Write 2
MC Mixed 1.9
6% 1.93 GB/s
SC Read 0.7
SC Write 1.3
SC Mixed 0.3
2% 0.77 GB/s
Latency 458
9% 458 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.37%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GM965 Series Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: LORD GM965 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback