Asus PRIME X299-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X299-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory58.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '21 at 12:35
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$393
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 76
1-Core 134
2-Core 270
86% 160 Pts
4-Core 539
8-Core 1,078
95% 808 Pts
64-Core 1,761
109% 1,761 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
AMD(1002 0B0D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1201 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.Q1.2
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 25.9
Parallax 29.4
15% 24.7 fps
MRender 25.1
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 22.6
19% 23.8 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
316GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 448 448 452 423 418 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 466
Mixed 423
SusWrite 437
103% 460 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 54.9
189% 67.3 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 304
244% 343 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 122%
Great: 125%
Ct2000mx 50 2TB
374GB free
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 278 283 287 286 284 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
108% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 468
Mixed 410
SusWrite 283
93% 416 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 52
176% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 295
239% 340 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 6TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 192 188 185 186 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 166
Mixed 179
SusWrite 188
186% 253 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 4
1,757% 12.3 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 194%
Great: 164%
ST500DM0 05 HD502HJ 500GB
122GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.5% Poor
Read 101
Write 110
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 0.1
86% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
132% 1.5 MB/s
ST320006 41AS 2TB
458GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 90.2
Write 94.2
Mixed 73
110% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
85% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 48%
TOSHIBA HDWD130 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 78 80 80 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 192
Write 182
Mixed 38.9
SusWrite 79.2
152% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
96% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 72%
WDC WD50 01AALS-00L3B2 500GB
247GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 78 80 80 79 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.8% Below average
Read 75.1
Write 75
Mixed 60
SusWrite 79.1
99% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
102% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D26BFSB.16FBD 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 61.4
MC Mixed 36.5
128% 44.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 10.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 111%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X299-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,081 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X299-DELUXE - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $935
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback