Asus M5A78L-M/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics39.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A78L-M/USB3  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141202
Uptime3 Days
Run DateMar 04 '19 at 21:53
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 87.8
1-Core 72.8
2-Core 147
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 380
39% 317 Pts
64-Core 393
24% 393 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.2.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Lighting 51.7
Reflection 34.3
Parallax 68.1
42% 51.4 fps
MRender 32.3
Gravity 53.1
Splatting 42.9
35% 42.8 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
255GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 78 79 82 84 84 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51% Above average
Read 216
Write 194
Mixed 188
SusWrite 81
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 46.6
4K Mixed 34.7
112% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 34.5
DQ Write 66.9
DQ Mixed 44.3
36% 48.6 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 51%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
163GB free
Firmware: HP63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 82 83 84 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 96
Write 87.3
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 82.7
59% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 68%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 128 128 127 126 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 142
Write 162
Mixed 94.9
SusWrite 124
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.8
372% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 92%
pny USB 2.0 FD 16GB
2GB free, PID 005d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 19.9
13% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
33% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 9%
Samsung G3 Station 2TB
125GB free, PID 6014
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 24.1
Write 24
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 15.1
27% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 22%
ST500DM0 02-1BD142 500GB
104GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
9.84% Terrible
Read 25.1
Write 23.8
Mixed 20.6
SusWrite 15.1
28% 21.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
60% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.84%
Great: 18%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 3TB
2TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 117 117 117 119 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 142
Write 144
Mixed 84.1
SusWrite 116
162% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
44.5% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 15.4
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 11.5
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A78L-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 - $53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $171
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback