Acer Aspire TC-705

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics10.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive85% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-705  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-705
Memory9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '19 at 19:23
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$132
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 90.9
1-Core 118
2-Core 231
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 599
63% 503 Pts
64-Core 599
37% 599 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
Sapphire(174B 249A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 359.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Lighting 14.1
Reflection 13.3
Parallax 9.84
12% 12.4 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 9.87
Splatting 14.1
10% 11.6 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 480GB-$129
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1203AB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 115 130 71 69 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 444
Write 82.2
Mixed 363
SusWrite 132
56% 255 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 86.9
4K Mixed 44.5
146% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 239
198% 284 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1KNG/8G ACR16D3LU1MNG/4G 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.1% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 9
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 11
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-705 Builds (Compare 552 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-705

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback