Acer Predator G3-605

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive99.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Predator G3-605  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator G3-605
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '18 at 10:00
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 78
1-Core 98.3
2-Core 203
71% 127 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 410
48% 374 Pts
64-Core 407
25% 407 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
Sapphire(174B 249A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.54
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Lighting 13.2
Reflection 12.9
Parallax 9.81
11% 12 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 12.2
Splatting 14
10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
802GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 438 428 441 432 433 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 453
Write 390
Mixed 412
SusWrite 433
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 61.5
4K Mixed 39.8
127% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 348
261% 349 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
2TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 100 96 98 88 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 155
Write 141
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 106
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 114%
WD 10EADS External 1TB
181GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 5.9 5.8 5.9 5.9 6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 35
Write 33.5
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 5.9
33% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12%
Great: 21%
WD 15EARS External 1.5TB
173GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 5.8 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 34.7
Write 35
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 5.8
33% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
67% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 21%
WD My Passport 0820 1TB
480GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 83 84 84 84 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 87.7
Write 84
Mixed 52
SusWrite 84
103% 76.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 44%
WD My Book 1110 639GB
198GB free, PID 1110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 33
Write 35
Mixed 29
SusWrite 5.9
34% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12%
Great: 19%
WD Elements 1.5TB
671GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 6.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 36.5
Write 35.5
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 5.9
34% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 22%
WD Elements 1.5TB
641GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 5.8 5.9 5.9 5.9 6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 34
Write 37
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 5.8
34% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 22%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
170GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 40 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 39.5
Write 38
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 41
50% 36.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 43%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
3TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.9 5.8 7.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 33.2
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 6
33% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1KNG/8G 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
51.1% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 15.5
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 15.3
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 84.3
48% 84.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G3-605 Builds (Compare 1,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Acer Predator G3-605

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $135
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback