Today's hottest deals

Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics87.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '21 at 08:14
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$148
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 87.5
1-Core 144
2-Core 270
92% 167 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 800
76% 627 Pts
64-Core 792
49% 792 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$200
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 118
Parallax 108
88% 111 fps
MRender 96.3
Gravity 107
Splatting 106
85% 103 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
223GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXY7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 771 513 509 500 493 486 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 1,977
Write 1,536
Mixed 934
SusWrite 545
277% 1,248 MB/s
4K Read 64.3
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 88.1
304% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,389
DQ Write 1,064
DQ Mixed 1,117
865% 1,190 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 261%
Great: 259%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
47GB free
Firmware: EXM03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 297 207 166 153 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 492
Mixed 369
SusWrite 236
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 60.5
212% 76.7 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 340
260% 353 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 117%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 107 106 104 104 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
78% Very good
Read 167
Write 138
Mixed 81.4
SusWrite 105
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78%
Great: 114%
WD 10EADS External 1TB
501GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Read 41.1
Write 39.7
Mixed 32
SusWrite 42.1
52% 38.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
75.3% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 22.9
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 24.3
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,460 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $907
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback