Today's hottest deals

Asus P8P67 PRO REV 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics73% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 PRO REV 3.1  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateMay 15 '21 at 17:45
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$158
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 178
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 416
45% 357 Pts
64-Core 405
25% 405 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$200
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73% Very good
Lighting 86.7
Reflection 108
Parallax 97.1
71% 97.2 fps
MRender 91.7
Gravity 94.8
Splatting 96.8
78% 94.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 73%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
824GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 409 412 416 421 409 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 401
Mixed 340
SusWrite 405
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 62.8
4K Mixed 34.1
115% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 296
236% 331 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
126GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 147 146 147 145 147 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 334
Write 227
Mixed 232
SusWrite 144
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 49.6
4K Mixed 37.7
122% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 149
112% 151 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 124%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$88
418GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 106 107 108 109 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 110
Write 110
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 106
70% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 74%
Seagate Desktop 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 24.7
Write 25
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 12.6
16% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.6
211% 2 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 93%
WD 10EADS External 1TB
865GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 27.5
Write 23
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 11.7
28% 21.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 21%
WD My Book 1140 3TB
2TB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 30.3
Write 24.2
Mixed 22
SusWrite 11.5
28% 22 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.4% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 14.5
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 15.8
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 PRO REV 3.1 Builds (Compare 483 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 PRO REV 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $516
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback