PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 73% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 94.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8P67 PRO REV 3.1 (all builds) |
Memory | 9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20121101 |
Uptime | 4.7 Days |
Run Date | May 15 '21 at 17:45 |
Run Duration | 187 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 19% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
72.7%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$200
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
73%
Very good
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
824GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 409 412 416 421 409 MB/s
|
94.5%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
126GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 147 146 147 145 147 MB/s
|
67.2%
Good
|
|||
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$88
418GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 106 107 108 109 107 MB/s
|
62.1%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Desktop 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 13 13 13 13 MB/s
|
11.2%
Very poor
|
|||
WD 10EADS External 1TB
865GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
|
11.6%
Very poor
|
|||
WD My Book 1140 3TB
2TB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 12 MB/s
|
14.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47.4%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 170x |
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 161x |
Core i7-2600Intel $158Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 46x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 43x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 36x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 29x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $516 |