Performance Results


Gaming 111% UFO	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 104% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	81.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C56
Motherboard	MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) (all builds)
Memory	56.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200831
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 01 '22 at 00:45
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	51%

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$150 383,420 User benchmarks, average bench 96% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Memory 69.3 1-Core 166 2-Core 309 96% 181 Pts	4-Core 518 8-Core 812 82% 665 Pts	64-Core 1,002 62% 1,002 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 107%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759 18,552 User benchmarks, average bench 143% Sapphire(1DA2 E437) ≥ 4GB Ram: 16GB, Driver: 22.Q2 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	136% Outstanding	Lighting 169 Reflection 162 Parallax 352 138% 228 fps	MRender 271 Gravity 124 Splatting 190 158% 195 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 136% Great: 153%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 459GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 397 388 335 344 349 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	81.3% Excellent	Read 271 Write 292 Mixed 224 SusWrite 361 65% 287 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 66.1 4K Mixed 29 104% 38.7 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 229 209% 320 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 133%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$167 31,076 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 1.5TB free Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 422 412 348 372 374 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	96.8% Outstanding	Read 367 Write 296 Mixed 290 SusWrite 385 75% 334 MB/s	4K Read 34 4K Write 73.3 4K Mixed 36.5 137% 47.9 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 361 DQ Mixed 371 279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 96.8% Great: 136%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 162GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 119 118 121 123 120 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	66.6% Good	Read 112 Write 114 Mixed 61.5 SusWrite 119 74% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB 6,447 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	65.1% Good	MC Read 26.8 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 25.9 67% 23.3 GB/s	SC Read 20.5 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 23.3 58% 20.2 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 136%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 91%

Nuclear submarine

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	812x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	655x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	512x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	905x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	754x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	421x

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $718

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16