Today's hottest deals

HP 500-221eo

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 500-221eo  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141031
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateOct 10 '21 at 13:15
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$185
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 92.1
2-Core 187
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 335
46% 341 Pts
64-Core 346
21% 346 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 645
Device(1B0A 90CC) 2GB
CLim: 823 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.07
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
9.43% Terrible
Lighting 10.7
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 14.2
9% 12.6 fps
MRender 14.6
Gravity 14.2
Splatting 11.5
11% 13.4 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.43%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
344GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 57 62 46 40 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 114
Write 114
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 57.6
65% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 109%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
377GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 108 110 107 107 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 97
Write 106
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 108
117% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 43%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
160GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 86 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 79.6
Write 85.6
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 85.7
96% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
31.7% Below average
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 9.1
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 10.7
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-221eo Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-221eo

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $210
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback