Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 71% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	84.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210615
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '22 at 05:19
Run Duration	519 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	66%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$130 383,420 User benchmarks, average bench 96% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	82.2% Excellent	Memory 74.1 1-Core 142 2-Core 269 88% 162 Pts	4-Core 485 8-Core 780 78% 632 Pts	64-Core 1,115 69% 1,115 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 107%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3701) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.51 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	84.8% Excellent	Lighting 106 Reflection 113 Parallax 103 86% 107 fps	MRender 94.2 Gravity 104 Splatting 101 82% 99.9 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$90 78,573 User benchmarks, average bench 338% 97GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,846 Write 3,228 Mixed 2778 661% 2,951 MB/s	4K Read 72.3 4K Write 160 4K Mixed 103 326% 112 MB/s	DQ Read 1,040 DQ Write 762 DQ Mixed 879 663% 893 MB/s
Poor: 210% Great: 429%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB 12,882 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 551GB free Firmware: M6CR030 SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 417 415 417 421 427 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Read 423 Write 367 Mixed 359 SusWrite 420 88% 393 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 75.9 4K Mixed 24.1 98% 39.3 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 179 DQ Mixed 41.9 69% 133 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 99%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB 12,882 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 972GB free Firmware: M6CR030 SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 418 416 418 421 430 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	85.9% Excellent	Read 494 Write 410 Mixed 389 SusWrite 422 96% 429 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 84.4 4K Mixed 25.7 106% 43 MB/s	DQ Read 180 DQ Write 179 DQ Mixed 40.8 69% 133 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 99%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB 12,882 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 1TB free Firmware: M6CR030 SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 417 415 417 421 428 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	88.1% Excellent	Read 487 Write 397 Mixed 387 SusWrite 421 95% 423 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 86.2 4K Mixed 24.2 115% 45.3 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 179 DQ Mixed 39.8 71% 141 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 99%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB 12,882 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 433GB free Firmware: M6CR030 SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 417 414 416 420 428 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	87.7% Excellent	Read 482 Write 399 Mixed 396 SusWrite 420 95% 424 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 77.6 4K Mixed 26.7 116% 43.8 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 178 DQ Mixed 41.6 68% 131 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 99%
Team T253A3002T 2TB 297 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 1.5TB free Firmware: T0317A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 417 414 416 420 420 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	86% Excellent	Read 441 Write 352 Mixed 337 SusWrite 418 87% 387 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 68.2 4K Mixed 31.1 113% 41.2 MB/s	DQ Read 183 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 50.4 74% 138 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 102%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70 163,917 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 865GB free Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1195 1212 1222 1215 1226 1226 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	221% Outstanding	Read 1,296 Write 1,287 Mixed 779 SusWrite 1216 257% 1,144 MB/s	4K Read 45.9 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 59.2 208% 74.7 MB/s	DQ Read 628 DQ Write 736 DQ Mixed 268 317% 544 MB/s
Poor: 127% ↑ This bench: 221% Great: 255%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70 163,917 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 945GB free Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1147 1165 1172 1196 1157 1155 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	232% Outstanding	Read 1,375 Write 1,272 Mixed 995 SusWrite 1,165 270% 1,202 MB/s	4K Read 51.3 4K Write 133 4K Mixed 71 239% 85 MB/s	DQ Read 624 DQ Write 781 DQ Mixed 270 324% 559 MB/s
Poor: 127% ↑ This bench: 232% Great: 255%
SABRENT DISK02 1TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 223GB free, PID 1561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.1 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	89.8% Excellent	Read 197 Write 162 Mixed 216 SusWrite 1.4 185% 144 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 18.9 4K Mixed 13.5 1,147% 14.8 MB/s	DQ Read 15.3 DQ Write 23.9 DQ Mixed 17.6 1,468% 18.9 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 161%
SABRENT DISK00 1TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 154% 335GB free, PID 1561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 187 185 185 136 26 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	110% Outstanding	Read 118 Write 101 Mixed 227 SusWrite 150 212% 149 MB/s	4K Read 12.9 4K Write 18.7 4K Mixed 14.4 1,174% 15.3 MB/s	DQ Read 16.3 DQ Write 23.6 DQ Mixed 18.1 1,479% 19.3 MB/s
Poor: 110% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 186%
SABRENT DISK01 1TB 78 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 233GB free, PID 1561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 176 178 176 130 23 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	136% Outstanding	Read 312 Write 297 Mixed 277 SusWrite 143 340% 257 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 18.4 4K Mixed 10.1 1,014% 13.5 MB/s	DQ Read 13.6 DQ Write 23.6 DQ Mixed 13.1 1,299% 16.8 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 136% Great: 214%
SABRENT DISK03 480GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 447GB free, PID 1561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 293 108 85 87 86 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	128% Outstanding	Read 249 Write 286 Mixed 260 SusWrite 158 324% 238 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 17.9 4K Mixed 13 1,096% 14.3 MB/s	DQ Read 15.9 DQ Write 24.6 DQ Mixed 17.2 1,481% 19.2 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 191%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Silicon-Power 4x8GB 224 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	MC Read 34.7 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 31.1 82% 28.6 GB/s	SC Read 23.3 SC Write 19.1 SC Mixed 28.7 68% 23.7 GB/s	Latency 92.2 43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,191 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $200

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $177Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,708x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $173Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,331x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $130Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,462x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $495Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,273x
RTX 3080Nvidia $550Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,094x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,490x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,861x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $110Bench 385%, 327,441 samples	1,121x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	876x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $38Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	778x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $50Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	737x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $103Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	653x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $1,003

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406