Gigabyte GA-Z270XP-SLI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics75.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive230% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z170XP-SLI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270XP-SLI  (all builds)
Memory23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161124
Uptime11.8 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '21 at 17:56
Run Duration274 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$229
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Memory 95.5
1-Core 143
2-Core 278
96% 172 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 760
78% 629 Pts
64-Core 782
48% 782 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 4990) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.3% Very good
Lighting 93.6
Reflection 110
Parallax 97.1
76% 100 fps
MRender 94.1
Gravity 92
Splatting 85
73% 90.4 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
399GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1148 1146 1102 1133 1170 1130 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 1,860
Write 1,370
Mixed 714
SusWrite 1,138
283% 1,270 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 70.9
4K Mixed 53.2
174% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,273
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 286
316% 566 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 230%
Great: 283%
Adata Ultimate SU800 1TB-$95
489GB free
Firmware: Q0922FS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 429 422 417 416 414 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 486
Write 398
Mixed 374
SusWrite 420
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 35.8
112% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 180
128% 165 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 126%
SABRENT DISK00 1TB
954GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 180 180 179 178 177 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
165% Outstanding
Read 366
Write 351
Mixed 322
SusWrite 179
403% 304 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 22.5
4K Mixed 19.2
1,475% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 16.8
DQ Write 32.7
DQ Mixed 22.9
1,953% 24.1 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 165%
Great: 186%
SABRENT DISK01 1TB
947GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 180 180 179 178 177 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 368
Write 356
Mixed 327
SusWrite 179
407% 307 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 23.6
4K Mixed 19.6
1,527% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 16.9
DQ Write 32.3
DQ Mixed 23
1,944% 24.1 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 169%
Great: 252%
SABRENT DISK02 1TB
951GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 181 181 181 178 163 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 368
Write 342
Mixed 321
SusWrite 177
399% 302 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 21.3
4K Mixed 17.8
1,387% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 17
DQ Write 32.8
DQ Mixed 22.7
1,951% 24.2 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 161%
Great: 161%
SABRENT DISK03 1TB
954GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 181 181 181 178 163 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 366
Write 342
Mixed 333
SusWrite 177
403% 304 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 24.2
4K Mixed 18
1,499% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 19.6
DQ Write 33.6
DQ Mixed 25.6
2,086% 26.3 MB/s
Poor: 156%
This bench: 170%
Great: 216%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 39.6
MC Mixed 31.6
102% 35.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 44.9
SC Mixed 33
96% 33.7 GB/s
Latency 55.6
72% 55.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 102%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270XP-SLI-CF Builds (Compare 989 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270XP-SLI - $88

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $736
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback