Asus PRIME H610M-R D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H610M-R D4  (all builds)
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '23 at 00:25
Run Duration306 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 40%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400-$150
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 68.2
1-Core 149
2-Core 290
89% 169 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 792
77% 634 Pts
64-Core 1,013
63% 1,013 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 545.92
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.1% Average
Lighting 54.8
Reflection 55.7
Parallax 49.5
45% 53.3 fps
MRender 42.3
Gravity 48.8
Splatting 45
37% 45.4 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS500GMTE110Q 500GB
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0204A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 8 428 12 65 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 1,756
Write 5.2
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 118
98% 472 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 4.2
24% 5.47 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 261%
HP S700 500GB-$60
42GB free
Firmware: R0522A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 122 127 18 95 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 475
Write 414
Mixed 393
SusWrite 127
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 74.2
4K Mixed 25.2
104% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 45.9
93% 185 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 100%
WDC WD40EZAZ-22SF3B0 4TB
53GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 114 111 123 122 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 224
Write 144
Mixed 80
SusWrite 117
31% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 0.6
8% 4.2 MB/s
DQ Read 0.8
DQ Write 11.6
DQ Mixed 1.4
2% 4.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 39%
Kingmax 960GB 960GB
303GB free
Firmware: V1.2.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 406 306 392 382 365 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 406
Write 432
Mixed 416
SusWrite 363
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 58.4
4K Mixed 31.4
113% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 285
212% 280 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 108%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 1TB
341GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 124 116 123 123 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
48% Average
Read 138
Write 146
Mixed 20
SusWrite 119
137% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
40% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48%
Great: 54%
Realtek RTL9210B-CG 1TB
384GB free, PID 9210
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 34 32 34 31 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 55.8
Write 33.7
Mixed 38
SusWrite 32.3
51% 40 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 9.4
648% 11.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 78%
WD My Passport 2626 5TB
179GB free, PID 2626
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 199
Mixed 1.7
67% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Mixed 0
1% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 62%
SABRENT DISK00 500GB
31GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 175 145 147 116 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 251
Write 359
Mixed 325
SusWrite 134
371% 267 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 12.7
4K Mixed 6.2
695% 11 MB/s
DQ Read 16.1
DQ Write 33
DQ Mixed 21
1,896% 23.4 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 108%
Great: 176%
SABRENT DISK01 1TB
28GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 5.5 21 4 4.5 7.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 179
Write 193
Mixed 88.9
SusWrite 9.3
147% 117 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 3.4
318% 4.57 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 214%
SABRENT DISK02 2TB
67GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 2.3 7 0.7 0.5 3.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 115% Great: 200%
SABRENT DISK03 1TB
63GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 172 137 145 114 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
156% Outstanding
Read 356
Write 343
Mixed 324
SusWrite 130
379% 288 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 23.7
4K Mixed 12.7
1,289% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 14.9
DQ Write 33.8
DQ Mixed 14.9
1,712% 21.2 MB/s
Poor: 156%
This bench: 156%
Great: 216%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMG32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
61.9% Good
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 22.4
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 13
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 20 0 60 24" 1280 720 SAM08DE S24B370
Typical PRIME H610M-R D4 Builds (Compare 379 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H610M-R D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $380
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback