Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics154% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P  (all builds)
Memory21.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220720
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 07 '23 at 16:54
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Memory 84.3
1-Core 133
2-Core 265
88% 161 Pts
4-Core 524
8-Core 1,007
91% 765 Pts
64-Core 1,842
114% 1,842 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 91%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$530
MSI(1462 5052) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.68
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
154% Outstanding
Lighting 230
Reflection 267
Parallax 216
188% 238 fps
MRender 230
Gravity 144
Splatting 117
128% 163 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 154%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P4CR311 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,556
Write 2,173
Mixed 1,425
455% 2,051 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 56.2
205% 71 MB/s
DQ Read 1,084
DQ Write 799
DQ Mixed 890
679% 924 MB/s
Poor: 175% Great: 370%
SABRENT DISK00 2TB
881GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 343
Write 384
Mixed 334
461% 354 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 29.9
4K Mixed 20.8
1,781% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 17.3
DQ Write 29.7
DQ Mixed 21.9
1,819% 23 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 218%
SABRENT DISK01 960GB
668GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 377
Write 376
Mixed 330
461% 361 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 30.7
4K Mixed 12.7
1,533% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 15.5
DQ Write 30.2
DQ Mixed 13.8
1,554% 19.8 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 198%
SABRENT DISK02 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 283 297 323 302 366 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
200% Outstanding
Read 350
Write 180
Mixed 226
SusWrite 298
341% 263 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 26.3
4K Mixed 16.7
1,515% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 15.6
DQ Write 27.8
DQ Mixed 18.2
1,622% 20.5 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 200%
Great: 200%
SABRENT DISK03 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 374
Write 397
Mixed 367
492% 379 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 29.6
4K Mixed 20.6
1,766% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 18.1
DQ Write 29.5
DQ Mixed 22.4
1,832% 23.3 MB/s
Poor: 131% Great: 168%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
117% Outstanding
MC Read 47.5
MC Write 40.7
MC Mixed 42.2
124% 43.5 GB/s
SC Read 27.6
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 40.5
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 117%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P Builds (Compare 2,320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $746
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback