ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus GL702VM

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	278% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus GL702VM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK GL702VM
Memory	28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190429
Uptime	3.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 14 '20 at 20:16
Run Duration	266 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Memory 81.4 1-Core 103 2-Core 196 73% 127 Pts	4-Core 355 8-Core 535 55% 445 Pts	64-Core 534 33% 534 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Asus(1043 1580) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 446.14 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	51.8% Above average	Lighting 62.5 Reflection 70.1 Parallax 63.4 51% 65.3 fps	MRender 69.3 Gravity 59.4 Splatting 67.3 54% 65.3 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 340GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 998 1322 1453 1596 1644 1574 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	278% Outstanding	Read 2,024 Write 1,541 Mixed 1,017 SusWrite 1,431 336% 1,503 MB/s	4K Read 55.4 4K Write 122 4K Mixed 69.3 238% 82.4 MB/s	DQ Read 983 DQ Write 643 DQ Mixed 834 617% 820 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 278% Great: 393%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79 71,106 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1.5TB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 120 119 119 118 117 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Read 90.4 Write 104 Mixed 66.8 SusWrite 118 70% 94.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.1 79% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 68%
Seagate Backup+ Desk Mac 2TB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1TB free, PID a0a4 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 178 184 185 183 185 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	67.7% Good	Read 173 Write 138 Mixed 80.8 SusWrite 178 188% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 71% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 69%
SABRENT DISK02 1TB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 233GB free, PID 1561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 5.6 0.5 0 0.2 6.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	19.4% Very poor	Read 85.2 Write 67.2 Mixed 51.8 SusWrite 7.6 65% 53 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 200%
SABRENT DISK00 480GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 446GB free, PID 1561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 111 114 116 118 119 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	148% Outstanding	Read 301 Write 321 Mixed 239 SusWrite 112 320% 244 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 24.9 4K Mixed 17.4 1,490% 18.7 MB/s	DQ Read 14.9 DQ Write 25.7 DQ Mixed 18.3 1,552% 19.6 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 148% Great: 199%
SABRENT DISK01 1TB 78 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 930GB free, PID 1561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 110 114 116 118 119 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	49.2% Average	Read 130 Write 128 Mixed 35.6 SusWrite 112 132% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 214%
SABRENT DISK03 480GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 110GB free, PID 1561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 321 320 321 319 173 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	191% Outstanding	Read 319 Write 323 Mixed 257 SusWrite 296 405% 299 MB/s	4K Read 14.6 4K Write 25.1 4K Mixed 18 1,520% 19.2 MB/s	DQ Read 15.5 DQ Write 26.1 DQ Mixed 19 1,592% 20.2 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 191% Great: 191%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905630-030.A00G 2x16GB 109 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	73% Very good	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 28.2 MC Mixed 23.2 75% 26.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 26.7 SC Mixed 22.7 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 77.9 51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical GL702VM Builds (Compare 448 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 30%

Raft

Desktop

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation

Workstation 25%

Surfboard

System: Asus GL702VM

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	417x
Core i5-6300HQIntelBench 54%, 41,531 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	445x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1x
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	1x

SSD
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	93x
MZNTY128HDHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 80%, 2,542 samples	43x
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	20x

RAM
M471A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GBSamsungBench 38%, 8,819 samples	147x
M471A1K43BB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 35%, 32,056 samples	32x
HMA82GS6MFR8N-TF 1x16GBHynixBench 38%, 4,427 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback