Dell XPS 8930

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics37% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive232% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell XPS 8930  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0T2HR0
Memory56.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 15 '21 at 20:16
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$237
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 72.6
1-Core 142
2-Core 277
88% 164 Pts
4-Core 568
8-Core 1,025
96% 797 Pts
64-Core 1,026
64% 1,026 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 99%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Dell(1028 0859) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7263
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
7.31% Terrible
Lighting 9.1
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 10.1
7% 9.9 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 10.4
7% 8.47 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.31%
Great: 7%
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Dell(1028 1265) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37% Below average
Lighting 46.8
Reflection 58.8
Parallax 35.5
38% 47 fps
MRender 38.7
Gravity 47.2
Splatting 41.5
35% 42.5 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 37%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg60znv256g NVMe TOSHIBA 256GB
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10604106 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1171 388 392 320 388 394 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 2,009
Write 1,611
Mixed 1246
SusWrite 509
299% 1,344 MB/s
4K Read 52.5
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 72.1
250% 90.7 MB/s
DQ Read 856
DQ Write 1,064
DQ Mixed 758
628% 893 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 232%
Great: 242%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
767GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 907 496 500 499 498 498 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$28
863GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 192 188 167 193 192 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 185
Mixed 85
SusWrite 187
119% 163 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 109%
Great: 113%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
2TB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 131 124 129 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 129
Write 129
Mixed 50
SusWrite 129
145% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 55%
SABRENT DISK02 1TB
931GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 21 21 19 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 39
Write 40
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 18.7
40% 30.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 200%
SABRENT DISK01 1TB
931GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 21 21 19 21 21 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 39.8
Write 40.2
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 23.3
48% 35.6 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 18.4
4K Mixed 15.6
1,205% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 14.1
DQ Write 19.7
DQ Mixed 16.4
1,280% 16.7 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 214%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
EDB53616 CMK32GX4M2A2666C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
64% Good
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 20.7
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 18.5
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 95.6
42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8930 Builds (Compare 6,509 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Dell XPS 8930

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback