HP TouchSmart 9300 Elite All-in-One PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemHP TouchSmart 9300 Elite All-in-One PC  (all builds)
MotherboardQuanta 2ABB
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20110629
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMar 08 '23 at 15:50
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$201
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 88.5
2-Core 176
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 415
46% 362 Pts
64-Core 414
26% 414 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 425M
Device(1B0A 907C) 1GB
CLim: 560 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.54
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
2.65% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 1.2
2% 3.03 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 2.6
3% 3.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.65%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S650 480GB
265GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN12155
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 418 410 424 427 426 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
90% Excellent
Read 394
Write 433
Mixed 399
SusWrite 420
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 34.6
123% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 250
186% 241 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 90%
Great: 106%
SABRENT DISK03 480GB
265GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Read 57.5
Write 24.2
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 28.4
42% 34.4 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 7.2
343% 7.1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 191%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 Micron 8JSF25664HZ-1G4D1 M471B5273DH0-CH9 Micron 8JSF25664HZ-1G4D1 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.7% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 14.3
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 15.2
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TouchSmart 9300 Elite All-in-One PC Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP TouchSmart 9300 Elite All-in-One PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $201
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback