Today's hottest deals

Sony VPCF13S1E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSony VPCF13S1E  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100903
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '22 at 12:08
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190
N/A, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
54.1% Above average
Memory 83
1-Core 46.7
2-Core 83.7
48% 71.1 Pts
4-Core 139
8-Core 200
21% 170 Pts
64-Core 223
14% 223 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 425M
Sony(104D 907A) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 266.72
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
2.78% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 5
Parallax 2.8
3% 3.73 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 3.1
Splatting 2.6
3% 3.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.78%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 115 14 17 66 74 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.4% Poor
Read 161
Write 91.4
Mixed 77
SusWrite 76.4
22% 101 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 12
30% 9.43 MB/s
DQ Read 22.8
DQ Write 42.3
DQ Mixed 33.6
25% 32.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 100%
Hitachi HTS725050A9A360 500GB
238GB free
Firmware: PC4OC70D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 91 94 93 93 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 89.5
Write 84.5
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 93.3
58% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
30.5% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 8.5
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 8.5
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VPCF13S1E Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Sony VPCF13S1E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback