Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME Z370-P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics138% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z370-P  (all builds)
Memory21.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '23 at 01:43
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$370
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Memory 84.5
1-Core 142
2-Core 282
92% 169 Pts
4-Core 555
8-Core 919
90% 737 Pts
64-Core 1,448
90% 1,448 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 94%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
138% Outstanding
Lighting 185
Reflection 242
Parallax 241
150% 223 fps
MRender 156
Gravity 202
Splatting 167
143% 175 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 138%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1095
Write 954
Mixed 193
164% 747 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 55.4
201% 72.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,052
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 101
197% 425 MB/s
Poor: 149% Great: 365%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
26GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,616
Write 2,343
Mixed 1742
496% 2,234 MB/s
4K Read 68.5
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 90.5
304% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,158
DQ Write 754
DQ Mixed 873
673% 928 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
SABRENT DISK00 480GB
99GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 19 8.2 11 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 51
Write 38.2
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 24.3
49% 38 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 13.3
4K Mixed 8.9
810% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 11.7
DQ Write 19.5
DQ Mixed 9.4
1,026% 13.5 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 199%
SABRENT DISK01 1TB
138GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 39.5
Write 41
Mixed 37
SusWrite 0.3
38% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 8.6
4K Mixed 9.9
670% 9.87 MB/s
DQ Read 9.7
DQ Write 11.9
DQ Mixed 10.4
794% 10.7 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 214%
SABRENT DISK02 1TB
143GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 2.9 1 1.4 4.7 4.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 40.2
Write 40.7
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 3.7
39% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 5.3
327% 6.53 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 200%
SABRENT DISK03 960GB
46GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 59.5
Write 31.2
Mixed 23.2
42% 38 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 8.5
4K Mixed 0.2
353% 8.07 MB/s
DQ Read 9.9
DQ Write 19.5
DQ Mixed 9.3
1,016% 12.9 MB/s
Poor: 93% Great: 204%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
71.6% Very good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 22.4
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 22.8
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 3 216 59 170 31.5" 2560 1377 GBT3206 G32QC A
Typical PRIME Z370-P Builds (Compare 10,737 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-P - $421

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $835
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback