Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics85.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJan 16 '22 at 16:59
Run Duration377 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 68.5
1-Core 144
2-Core 283
88% 165 Pts
4-Core 525
8-Core 884
86% 704 Pts
64-Core 1,108
69% 1,108 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300
Sapphire(1DA2 E426) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 21.12.1
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 125
Parallax 176
90% 137 fps
MRender 98.6
Gravity 115
Splatting 78.4
78% 97.3 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
215GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 240 229 223 211 213 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 476
Mixed 398
SusWrite 263
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 58.8
4K Mixed 45.5
158% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 96.1
DQ Mixed 191
153% 224 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 134%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
382GB free
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 443 450 457 441 453 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 429
Mixed 404
SusWrite 449
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 57.2
4K Mixed 44
144% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 85.8
DQ Mixed 168
140% 211 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 103%
Great: 125%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$126
450GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1533 839 841 820 843 843 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1,591
Write 1,914
Mixed 1,500
SusWrite 953
336% 1,489 MB/s
4K Read 54
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 59.7
193% 59.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,278
DQ Write 89.2
DQ Mixed 178
257% 515 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 212%
Great: 276%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Silicon-Power 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.9% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 30.1
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 30.3
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,091 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $414
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback