Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 88% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 90% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	83.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170224
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 04 '17 at 00:39
Run Duration	654 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	82% Excellent	Memory 75.6 1-Core 120 2-Core 238 79% 144 Pts	4-Core 474 8-Core 910 82% 692 Pts	64-Core 1,305 81% 1,305 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% EVGA(3842 6180) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.49 Performing below potential (61^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	103% Outstanding	Lighting 133 Reflection 143 Parallax 133 109% 137 fps	MRender 112 Gravity 127 Splatting 104 93% 114 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Neutron GTX 480GB-$400 512 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 181GB free (System drive) Firmware: M310 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 166 166 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 67 67 29946 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 205 (AB) Unknown 253 253 0 (AC) Unknown 253 253 0 (B5) Unknown 253 253 0 (B6) Unknown 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 31 0 21477785631 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 99 99 2 (EA) Unknown 100 100 271003 (F1) Unknown 100 100 10227 (F2) Unknown 100 100 33333 (FA) Read error retry rate 253 253 0	83.7% Excellent	Read 496 Write 425 Mixed 374 96% 432 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 64.7 4K Mixed 25.4 101% 37.6 MB/s	DQ Read 144 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 17.1 53% 112 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 102%
OCZ Trion 150 480GB-$300 13,412 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 100GB free Firmware: SAFZ12.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4273 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 63 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 191 191 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 8 (C2) HDA temperature 70 58 180389806110 (F1) Unknown 100 100 64152	71.1% Very good	Read 514 Write 351 Mixed 353 90% 406 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 48.2 4K Mixed 9.46 78% 28.2 MB/s	DQ Read 183 DQ Write 130 DQ Mixed 44.3 63% 119 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 101%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 3TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 100 253 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 5 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 19 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 5 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 1 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 9 (C2) HDA temperature 121 116 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	84.2% Excellent	Read 143 Write 150 Mixed 138 108% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.88 4K Write 2.42 4K Mixed 0.29 114% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 88%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 968GB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 59 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 68 38 9858 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 181 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 19623 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 214 (B5) Unknown 81 81 426069530 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 105 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 60 171798757403 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 43 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 270	68.1% Good	Read 102 Write 136 Mixed 120 90% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 0.97 4K Mixed 0.25 59% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 72%
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1.5TB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	17.4% Very poor	Read 38.1 Write 39.5 Mixed 16.4 38% 31.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 1.01 4K Mixed 0.56 56% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 48%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 829GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	20.5% Poor	Read 38.4 Write 38.3 Mixed 11.1 35% 29.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 2.08 4K Mixed 0.37 86% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 20.5% Great: 41%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 711GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	20.9% Poor	Read 38.3 Write 39.6 Mixed 23.7 42% 33.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.08 4K Write 2.11 4K Mixed 0.17 81% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 52%
ST375064 0AS 750GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 296GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	16.7% Very poor	Read 38.1 Write 38.3 Mixed 36 48% 37.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 0.88 4K Mixed 0.34 44% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 25%
ST350063 0AS 500GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 261GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Read 37.3 Write 39.3 Mixed 37.2 49% 37.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.31 4K Mixed 0.4 61% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 31%
Memorex Mini TravelDrive 2GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 2GB free, PID 0016 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	2.53% Terrible	Read 7.26 Write 2.53 Mixed 3.83 5% 4.54 MB/s	4K Read 3.81 4K Write 0.009 4K Mixed 0.007 15% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.53% Great: 4%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4-2666C DDR4 2x8GB 284 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	90.4% Outstanding	MC Read 36.9 MC Write 31.9 MC Mixed 29.6 94% 32.8 GB/s	SC Read 21.8 SC Write 35.2 SC Mixed 25.5 79% 27.5 GB/s	Latency 89.1 45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	425x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $195Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	330x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	206x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	221x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	195x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	191x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	95x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	76x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $50Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	162x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	125x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $33Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $649

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)