Today's hottest deals

Asrock FM2A88X Extreme4+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A88X Extreme4+  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160513
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 21 '17 at 07:33
Run Duration569 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Memory 77.1
1-Core 69.1
2-Core 127
56% 91.1 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 163
23% 171 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 61%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Nvidia(10DE 080A) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.09% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 1.81
Parallax 0.31
1% 1.14 fps
MRender 1.76
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.52
1% 1.38 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.09%
Great: 1%
AMD Radeon HD 6450
PwrHis(1787 2311) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.77% Terrible
Lighting 2.33
Reflection 2.35
Parallax 1.97
2% 2.22 fps
MRender 1.86
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 2
2% 1.82 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.77%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 3TB-$60
3TB free
Firmware: MKAO Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 86.5
Write 60.2
Mixed 70.7
55% 72.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.08
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.47
130% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 87%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9401
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 186
Mixed 154
130% 173 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.23
88% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
2TB free
Firmware: JKAOA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 115
Write 127
Mixed 112
89% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 1.33
4K Mixed 0.4
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 69%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$90
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 123
Write 96.6
Mixed 96.6
79% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.99
4K Mixed 0.2
77% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 87%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$90
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 110
Write 105
Mixed 69.4
71% 95 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.76
4K Mixed 0.25
81% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 87%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$90
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 77.2
Write 54.9
Mixed 65.5
50% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 2.04
4K Mixed 0.25
91% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 87%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 2TB-$105
1TB free
Firmware: 1AN1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
41% Average
Read 81.3
Write 60.8
Mixed 59.3
50% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 2.95
4K Mixed 0.54
139% 1.36 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 41%
Great: 59%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 3TB-$60
803GB free
Firmware: MKAOA390 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
60% Above average
Read 106
Write 103
Mixed 26.9
57% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.43
117% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60%
Great: 87%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
745GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 79.6
Write 80.7
Mixed 76.2
59% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.99
4K Mixed 0.41
106% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 51%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
509GB free
Firmware: 1AQ1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 78.1
Write 59.8
Mixed 68.1
52% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 2.91
4K Mixed 0.41
115% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 72%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
366GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 183
Mixed 161
135% 180 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 1.79
4K Mixed 0.24
73% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 108%
Great: 88%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
208GB free
Firmware: 9401
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 124
Write 115
Mixed 110
88% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 0.24
83% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 104%
SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB
930GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 12.6
Write 118
Mixed 98.8
119% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.31
95% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 35%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB
742GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 92
Write 97.5
Mixed 79
115% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.14
68% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 40%
SAMSUNG HD753LJ 750GB
629GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 81.7
Write 83.9
Mixed 73.7
102% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 2.17
4K Mixed 0.41
90% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37%
Great: 40%
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB
303GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 88.2
Write 82.5
Mixed 51.2
91% 74 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 5.64
4K Mixed 0.27
202% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ16GX3M4X1866C9 CMZ8GX3M1A1600C9 CMZ16GX3M4X1866C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.2% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.37 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 7
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 86.1
46% 86.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A88X Extreme4+ Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88X Extreme4+ - $104

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $252
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback