Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics51.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170620
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJun 04 '22 at 20:32
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Memory 65
1-Core 79
2-Core 172
59% 105 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 286
34% 265 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$144
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.2% Above average
Lighting 62.5
Reflection 65.1
Parallax 60.2
51% 62.6 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 65.2
Splatting 59.7
52% 63.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TEAML5Lite3D1T 1TB
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0410A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 392 347 130 120 140 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 448
Write 428
Mixed 371
SusWrite 238
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 73.6
4K Mixed 44.8
142% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 125
146% 254 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 125%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 3TB-$60
2TB free
Firmware: MKAOA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 122 135 135 135 135 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 15.2
Write 130
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 125
59% 80.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2133 C14 Series 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
37.3% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 14
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,582 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback