MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A32
MotherboardMSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32)  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170316
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '19 at 03:23
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 76.9
1-Core 124
2-Core 251
82% 151 Pts
4-Core 495
8-Core 792
79% 643 Pts
64-Core 1,027
64% 1,027 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35% Below average
Lighting 39.7
Reflection 45.8
Parallax 37.2
32% 40.9 fps
MRender 56.7
Gravity 39.7
Splatting 50.2
40% 48.9 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 35%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
306GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1100 1164 1151 1162 1166 1169 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 1,450
Write 1,170
Mixed 1080
SusWrite 1152
272% 1,213 MB/s
4K Read 50.7
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 70.9
229% 79.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,093
DQ Write 955
DQ Mixed 1,012
762% 1020 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 245%
Great: 393%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
53GB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,943
Write 1,394
Mixed 542
284% 1,293 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 46.9
173% 64.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,046
DQ Write 887
DQ Mixed 631
564% 855 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
219GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 116 116 116 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 129
Write 115
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 115
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-2666C DDR4 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 1067 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 31.9
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 33.4
SC Mixed 24.5
76% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 86.6
46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) Builds (Compare 1,838 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) - $155

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $689
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback