Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 136%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics159% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201022
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 27 '22 at 21:13
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 79.8
1-Core 137
2-Core 270
88% 162 Pts
4-Core 517
8-Core 828
83% 673 Pts
64-Core 1,100
68% 1,100 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$499
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
159% Outstanding
Lighting 236
Reflection 209
Parallax 202
192% 216 fps
MRender 244
Gravity 158
Splatting 128
139% 177 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 159%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$113
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,540
Write 2048
Mixed 1,409
443% 1,999 MB/s
4K Read 52.2
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 72.8
263% 98.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,215
DQ Write 920
DQ Mixed 1,045
787% 1,060 MB/s
Poor: 266% Great: 477%
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
12GB free
Firmware: S5Z42102
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,672
Write 1,342
Mixed 248
238% 1,087 MB/s
4K Read 64.1
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 85.2
289% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 772
DQ Write 717
DQ Mixed 244
320% 578 MB/s
Poor: 118% Great: 277%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$80
133GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 70 72 71 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 76.4
Write 76.8
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 70.6
53% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$100
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 36.8
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 33.5
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 2,392 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $630
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback