Today's hottest deals

MSI X99A SLI PLUS(MS-7885)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99A SLI PLUS(MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory60.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151030
Uptime5.4 Days
Run DateSep 12 '16 at 22:00
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 2.20GHz
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 77.7
1-Core 76.6
2-Core 148
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 573
51% 432 Pts
64-Core 1,394
86% 1,394 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820
HP(103C 1096) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6256
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.4% Poor
Lighting 26.1
Reflection 26.8
Parallax 33.8
21% 28.9 fps
MRender 39.1
Gravity 25.7
Splatting 27.2
25% 30.7 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
238GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 520
Write 494
Mixed 504
113% 506 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 33.2
4K Mixed 17.8
73% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 22.8
DQ Write 36.2
DQ Mixed 124
67% 60.8 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$215
189GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 519
Write 496
Mixed 506
113% 507 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 32.4
4K Mixed 28
86% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 22.2
DQ Write 36.1
DQ Mixed 13
14% 23.8 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 124%
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 256GB-$223
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 1,879
Write 1,239
Mixed 1,414
335% 1,511 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 28.3
95% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 24.2
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 15.1
42% 83.4 MB/s
Poor: 109%
This bench: 186%
Great: 220%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
92GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 491
Write 344
Mixed 338
87% 391 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 22.9
4K Mixed 14.5
65% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 23.7
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 9.7
36% 72.8 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 108%
ST3000DM 001-1ER166 3TB
2TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 186
Write 181
Mixed 131
208% 166 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.24
70% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 68%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
2TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 127
Write 126
Mixed 78.1
138% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.05
4K Write 1.79
4K Mixed 0.19
71% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 52%
ST320006 41AS 2TB
126GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 74.3
Write 84.6
Mixed 79.8
104% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.15
4K Mixed 0.36
53% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 39%
ST320006 41AS 2TB
104GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39% Below average
Read 106
Write 90.1
Mixed 78.8
114% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.27
4K Mixed 0.32
56% 0.7 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C14 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 57.9
MC Write 37.5
MC Mixed 45.5
134% 47 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 15
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 84.9
47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 115%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A SLI PLUS(MS-7885) Builds (Compare 1,603 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI X99A SLI PLUS(MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $415
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback