Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive321% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS XI CODE  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190318
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 27 '19 at 21:26
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$385
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Memory 97.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 229
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 808
75% 627 Pts
64-Core 1,250
77% 1,250 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
134% Outstanding
Lighting 186
Reflection 178
Parallax 192
151% 185 fps
MRender 205
Gravity 162
Splatting 115
126% 161 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 134%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
839GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1797 1713 1651 1600 1590 1602 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
321% Outstanding
Read 2,452
Write 2,175
Mixed 1,330
SusWrite 1,659
426% 1,904 MB/s
4K Read 58.5
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 80.4
265% 92.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,002
DQ Write 761
DQ Mixed 909
672% 890 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 321%
Great: 410%
Seagate ST3750330AS 750GB-$137
21GB free
Firmware: SD15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 52 53 53 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 53.8
Write 50.5
Mixed 36.3
SusWrite 52.6
36% 48.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 58%
Seagate Constellation ES.3 2TB-$60
2TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 130 161 134 141 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 174
Mixed 99
SusWrite 141
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
209% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 104%
ST320006 41AS 2TB
202GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 16 9.9 13 13 6.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
4.35% Terrible
Read 10
Write 12.5
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 11.8
16% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.35%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 4000 C19 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
MC Read 38.8
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 29
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 38.2
SC Mixed 29
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 50
80% 50 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS XI CODE Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI CODE - $759

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $1,773
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback