Average Bench: 13.8% - 341st / 613

Based on 3,490 user benchmarks.  Device: VID 0951 PID 1666 Model: Kingston DataTraveler 3.0

This is one of the Kingston's newest flash drives and yet another drive from Kingston with no claimed read or write speeds on the official documentation, not an encouraging sign (Kingston have since quoted Read/Write speeds of 40/10 MB/s). With a sequential write speed of 9.9 MB/s and a random write of 0.046 MB/s This drive is actually slower at writing than a lot of USB 2.0 drives, it's seriously dog slow. I really don't understand why Kingston have released a flash drive with specs like this but then I guess they didn't write the speed in the specs for a reason! There is no reason to buy this drive, as there are far better USB 3.0 flash drives out there for approximately the same money. Kingston's own DTR30 is a far better drive for an extra five pounds. If you really don't want to spend more than £10 then the Verbatim Store n Go V3 is better for the money. [Jun '13 USBFlashPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Terrible average bench

The Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB averaged 86.1% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. 4K Random Read Speed 7.1MB/s
Avg. Sequential Read Speed 61.7MB/s
See where your USB ranks →

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB is just 19.3%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Sequential Write Speed 11.3MB/s
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed 0.2MB/s
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 3,490 samples)
Min Avg Max
23.4 Read 61.7 132
5.01 Write 11.3 23.9
7.42 Mixed 14.8 31.2
27.5% 29.2 MB/s
Min Avg Max
3.31 4K Read 7.1 12.6
0.003 4K Write 0.25 0.77
0.003 4K Mixed 0.2 0.7
41.7% 2.52 MB/s
User Benchmarks Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
The fastest USB (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
14GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Read 131
Write 8.01
Mixed 11.2
39% 49.9 MB/s
4K Read 9.98
4K Write 0.04
4K Mixed 0.04
40% 3.35 MB/s
5GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Read 113
Write 7.49
Mixed 10.7
34% 43.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.25
4K Write 0.04
4K Mixed 0.05
23% 1.78 MB/s
10GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Read 31.7
Write 21.6
Mixed 10.9
24% 21.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.24
4K Write 0.009
4K Mixed 0.007
24% 2.08 MB/s
12GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Read 36
Write 7.05
Mixed 11.9
18% 18.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.46
4K Write 0.04
4K Mixed 0.05
27% 2.19 MB/s
13GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Read 26.2
Write 5.17
Mixed 11.1
14% 14.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.82
4K Write 0.34
4K Mixed 0.29
39% 1.81 MB/s

 Prices

NeweggUS $7.282 hrs ago.
AmazonUS $7.494 days ago.
BHPhotoUS $10.7914 hrs ago.
Send price feedback
Typical DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB Builds (Compare 10,808 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $153

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $1,062

Popular DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your USB? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
USB Flash Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) February 2017 USB Rankings.

We highlight the best USB flash drive in terms of balanced performance and value for money using price, sequential read, sequential write , 4k read and 4k write speed. The speeds are combined to form a single effective speed which measures performance for tasks such as copying photos, music and videos. Effective speed is adjusted by price and capacity to yield value for money. Finally thousands of individual user ratings are used to validate our benchmark figures. Vote to share your opinion. [USBFlashPro]

 Comments

DT100G3 features a sleek, cost-effective design...

Capacities 8GB, 16GB, 32GB, 64GB
Compliant with USB 3.0 specifications
Dimensions 2.362" x 0.835" x 0.394" (60mm x 21.2mm x10mm)
Five-year warranty, free technical support

Added 3 years ago.

Good (edit your comment) Add link

23 days ago.

Swell

Comment 

Usability on a Mac is off the cart bad. It's as slow as a regular USB 2 drive or slower. It's nearly impossible to make a bootable Mac Install drive from one. Mount times are very long, like 1 minute. Unmount is just as long. Do not buy this drive.—Sep '14

Comment 

The only thing going for this flash drive is the price. The write speed sucks. I have 2.0 Flash Drives that write faster than this Kingston. I used the freeware chkflsh (recommended) and I got a write speed of 8.38. Kingston should feel ashamed of that performance and calling this a 3.0. Not recommended unless your a buying it to download a file and give it away.—Jan '15


Good

2 months ago.

very slow - Wish I had checked hear. Bought two for transferring large media files and its painfully slow. Is definitely not a USB 3.0 standard. Terrible DO NOT BUY.


Good

23 days ago.

The speed/price ratio is pretty good. At this price range, it's full of cheap 2.0 usb drives.

Comment 

Ridiculously slow. So slow I thought it was defective.—Sep '14


Poor

2 months ago.

Very slow


Good

7 days ago.

slowest drive ever buyed


Poor

23 days ago.

muy lento


Liked

1 month ago.

Comment 

Price is good, form factor looks good. Not the fastest but it gets the job done. —Sep '14


Good

2 months ago.

Don't ...


Good

5 months ago.

----------------------------------------------------------------------- CrystalDiskMark 3.0.2 x64 (C) 2007-2013 hiyohiyo Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- * MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s] Sequential Read : 62.683 MB/s Sequential Write : 9.878 MB/s Random Read 512KB : 69.548 MB/s Random Write 512KB : 0.489 MB/s Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 7.105 MB/s Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 0.046 MB/s Test : 500 MB ---------------------------------------


Good

2 months ago.

slow speed drive


Poor

1 month ago.

This thing is painfully slow. This is the last time I'm buying anything from Kingston.


Liked

2 months ago.

Comment 

i bought it... and i'm regretting to get this piece of sh**.....—Sep '14


Good

14 months ago.

is very bad


Poor

1 month ago.

horrible copy speed


Good

3 months ago.

++++++


Terrible

3 years ago.


Good

1 month ago.

SAME AS ALL ABOVE, DO NOT BUY THIS


Good

16 months ago.

Scored it 8.6, 0.6 for the speed, 8.0 for the price

Comment 

Purchased one of these because the price was good. It was so slow that I searched to see if others had same problem. Slower than USB 2.0 for writing, somewhat faster for reading but very slow for a USB 3.0 device.—Sep '14


Poor

16 months ago.

Same as some people here, so slow I thought it was defective. Pity I didn't look it up before I bought.


Poor

7 months ago.

i don´t understand with kingston sell this piece of garbage.


Good

3 years ago.

Pretty poor speeds for a USB 3.0 drive ... CrystalDiskMark Benchmark Test Result 62.6/9.9 Sequential read/write speed 7.1/0.046 Random 4k read/write speed.


Poor

2 months ago.

fucking slow 4 usb 3.0 up


Your
opinion?
▲Like   ▼Dislike

You have viewed 79 pages, please contribute.


613 Drives (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different USBs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $349Nvidia GTX 1070 $370Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $94
Intel Core i7-6700K $320AMD RX 480 $175Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $120
Intel Core i5-7600K $230Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $164
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $125SanDisk Extreme 64GB $34
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $90G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $555SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $46HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $123SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $9
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback