Asrock FM2A85X Extreme6

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A85X Extreme6 (all builds)
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121219
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 10 '18 at 05:52
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119 18,312 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	61% Good	Memory 86 1-Core 69.5 2-Core 128 59% 94.4 Pts	4-Core 213 8-Core 202 28% 208 Pts	64-Core 213 13% 213 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660D 7,665 User benchmarks, average bench 5% ASRock(1849 9901) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.101.0.0 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	3.4% Terrible	Lighting 3.87 Reflection 6.04 Parallax 7.47 3% 5.79 fps	MRender 3.29 Gravity 6.07 Splatting 4.78 4% 4.71 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.4% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso 128GB 128GB 1,805 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: O0213E Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 627 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1256 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 253 (A2) Unknown 100 100 1 (A3) Unknown 100 100 149 (A4) Unknown 100 100 397852 (A5) Unknown 100 100 114 (A6) Unknown 100 100 62 (A7) Unknown 100 100 100 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 65 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 202866 (F2) Unknown 100 100 134494	33.8% Below average	Read 327 Write 161 Mixed 150 47% 213 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 17.4 4K Mixed 2.18 36% 11.9 MB/s	DQ Read 21.9 DQ Write 19.3 DQ Mixed 3.3 7% 14.8 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 96%
Hitachi HCS5C1010CLA382 1TB 2,229 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 699GB free Firmware: JC4OA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 99 131072 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 126 126 8609202435 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3683 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6404 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2207 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 3683 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 3683 (C2) HDA temperature 250 250 180389543960 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	54.1% Above average	Read 77.7 Write 111 Mixed 27.1 52% 71.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.29 4K Mixed 0.37 86% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 64%
Corsair Flash Voyager GT USB 3.0 32GB-$20 701 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 5GB free, PID 1a09 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Read 35 Write 29.6 Mixed 23.9 36% 29.5 MB/s	4K Read 11.7 4K Write 0.28 4K Mixed 0.23 61% 4.06 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 51%
Generic USB 2.0 1GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 0GB free, PID 7777 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.1% Below average	Read 20.9 Write 23.2 Mixed 22.1 29% 22 MB/s	4K Read 3.49 4K Write 6.91 4K Mixed 2.7 340% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 1x8GB 7,988 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24.6% Poor	MC Read 10.1 MC Write 4.3 MC Mixed 7.6 21% 7.33 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 8.7 24% 8.2 GB/s	Latency 71.2 56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 35%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A85X Extreme6 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A85X Extreme6 - $239

CPU
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	10x
A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)AMD $467Bench 51%, 11,295 samples	4x
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 7660DAMDBench 5%, 7,665 samples	2x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	2x
R9 280XAMD $500Bench 35%, 94,130 samples	1x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	2x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	2x
Vertex 3 MAX IOPS 120GBOCZ $106Bench 73%, 3,124 samples	1x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 28,220 samples	1x
KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GBKingstonBench 45%, 349 samples	1x
Ripjaws DDR3 1333 C7 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 472 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $488

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16