Today's hottest deals

Asus H97-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H97-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141009
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateJan 18 '22 at 13:49
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 92.6
1-Core 105
2-Core 204
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 391
52% 392 Pts
64-Core 396
24% 396 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$144
Nvidia(10DE 1C02) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (88th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (67 fps cap detected)
53.8% Above average
Lighting 66.5
Reflection 67.2
Parallax 61.8
54% 65.2 fps
MRender 66.6
Gravity 67.7
Splatting 61.3
53% 65.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 120GB-$76
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X31200RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 392
Write 152
Mixed 232
57% 259 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 70.3
4K Mixed 36.8
133% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 200
171% 251 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 93%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
142GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 107 106 105 106 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 126
Write 106
Mixed 60.6
SusWrite 106
73% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
192% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
35.2% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 10.3
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11.3
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,006 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PLUS - $414

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $829
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback