Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A78L-M LX3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A78L-M LX3  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '21 at 15:00
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4300-$73
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61% Good
Memory 90
1-Core 67
2-Core 126
60% 94.4 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 184
25% 187 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 61%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450
Sapphire(174B E204) 1GB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.18% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 2.1
2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.18%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HCS5C1010CLA382 1TB
906GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4OA39C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 80 71 82 65 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Read 8.5
Write 4.5
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 72.7
17% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
71% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 64%
USB Flash Memory 16GB
14GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 4.4 3.6 4 3.8 3.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.7% Terrible
Read 27.3
Write 4.5
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 4.2
11% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.7%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
43.9% Average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 15.3
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 11.2
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A78L-M LX3 Builds (Compare 1,379 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M LX3 - $147

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $321
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback