Lenovo 3259LJG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemLenovo 3259LJG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3259LJG
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120911
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '18 at 20:26
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3632QM
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 79.7
1-Core 53.3
2-Core 126
53% 86.5 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 361
32% 270 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 5001) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.77% Terrible
Lighting 3.27
Reflection 3.38
Parallax 2.03
3% 2.89 fps
MRender 4.33
Gravity 1.83
Splatting 4.52
3% 3.56 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.77%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 600ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 70 81 84 74 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
49% Average
Read 224
Write 112
Mixed 155
SusWrite 74
31% 141 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 61.6
4K Mixed 28.3
99% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 92.1
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 89.8
72% 101 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49%
Great: 73%
Corsair Flash Voyager GT USB 3.0 32GB-$20
13GB free, PID 1a09
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 19 21 23 22 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 25.2
Mixed 23.8
SusWrite 19.8
33% 25 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 2
96% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
51.7% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.5
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 14.3
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback