Gigabyte GA-B550 UD AC-Y1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive398% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550 UD AC-Y1  (all builds)
Memory58.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230608
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 22:04
Run Duration505 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$162
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 92
1-Core 172
2-Core 343
108% 202 Pts
4-Core 683
8-Core 1,264
116% 974 Pts
64-Core 1,538
95% 1,538 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 110%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$256
Device(1B4C 1522) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3850 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 130
Parallax 135
117% 136 fps
MRender 147
Gravity 112
Splatting 96.4
94% 118 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 107%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent SB-ROCKET-NVMe4-1TB 1TB
735GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT4B5.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3101 3222 3232 3137 3286 1716 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
398% Outstanding
Read 1,908
Write 3,358
Mixed 2,268
SusWrite 2,949
596% 2,621 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 90.3
264% 97.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,583
DQ Write 1,018
DQ Mixed 1,282
961% 1,294 MB/s
Poor: 205%
This bench: 398%
Great: 482%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
450GB free
Firmware: VB421D70 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1233 1267 1267 1267 1268 1267 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 2449
Write 1285
Mixed 1,277
SusWrite 1,262
348% 1,568 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 54.2
212% 85.3 MB/s
DQ Read 674
DQ Write 705
DQ Mixed 862
601% 747 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 270%
Great: 310%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB
670GB free, PID a578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 34 40 40 35 41 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.1% Below average
Read 127
Write 109
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 36
109% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 42%
HUH72808 0ALE601 8TB
5TB free, PID a578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 117
Write 176
Mixed 74.8
160% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1
187% 2.13 MB/s
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB
398GB free, PID a578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.7% Poor
Read 120
Write 115
Mixed 72.1
SusWrite 24.5
105% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.1 MB/s
HGST HUH 721010ALE600 10TB
4.5TB free, PID a578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 184
Write 198
Mixed 128
215% 170 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 1.1
252% 3.33 MB/s
TOSHIBA THNSNJ256GCSU 256GB
117GB free, PID a578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 80 79 69 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 263
Write 51.5
Mixed 96.2
SusWrite 74.3
133% 121 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 25.7
4K Mixed 18.3
1,545% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 7.3
DQ Write 25.6
DQ Mixed 19.8
1,571% 17.6 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 136%
Great: 163%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE640 4TB
2.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 81 73 77 83 74 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.3% Average
Read 157
Write 156
Mixed 93.3
SusWrite 78.7
158% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 46%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB
818GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0 0.2 0.1 0.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Read 125
Write 134
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 0.1
105% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 54%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0.2 0 0.1 0.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 104
Write 98
Mixed 70
SusWrite 0.1
85% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 54%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 81 73 77 83 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 164
Write 164
Mixed 91.4
SusWrite 78.7
162% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 54%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB
415GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 96 95 96 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 130
Write 132
Mixed 76.6
SusWrite 95.6
144% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 54%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB
2.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 51 51 51 52 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 141
Write 154
Mixed 83.6
SusWrite 51.3
140% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 54%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB
1TB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 119
Write 116
Mixed 67.5
125% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 54%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB
621GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.1 0 0.1 0.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
24.1% Poor
Read 125
Write 126
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 0.1
101% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 54%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB
2.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 50 50 50 50 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 148
Write 144
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 50
137% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 54%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB
2TB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 123
Write 137
Mixed 76.4
142% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 54%
JMicron Generic DISK00 4TB
364GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 53 53 53 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 136
Write 127
Mixed 77
SusWrite 52.6
126% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 73%
JMicron Generic DISK01 4TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 53 53 53 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 147
Write 148
Mixed 84.6
SusWrite 52.6
139% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 74%
JMicron Generic DISK02 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0 0.1 0 0.1 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Read 123
Write 138
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 0.1
107% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 68%
JMicron Generic DISK03 4TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 72.4
Write 106
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 0.5
78% 59.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 44.5
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 41
107% 37.5 GB/s
SC Read 32.2
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 44.5
99% 34.5 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 106%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 36.1" 1280 720 INS4303 NS43DF710NA21
Typical GA-B550 UD AC-Y1 Builds (Compare 159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550 UD AC-Y1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $376
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback