Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte B450 AORUS M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics77.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive276% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte B450 AORUS M  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '22 at 00:07
Run Duration332 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Memory 79.6
1-Core 168
2-Core 329
102% 192 Pts
4-Core 616
8-Core 988
98% 802 Pts
64-Core 1,323
82% 1,323 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$244
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Lighting 106
Reflection 87.8
Parallax 93.4
86% 95.7 fps
MRender 85.7
Gravity 74.8
Splatting 67.6
61% 76 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS2130 1TB SSD
511GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS213530
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1882 1905 1854 1906 1528 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
276% Outstanding
Read 1,372
Write 1,908
Mixed 1,313
SusWrite 1,533
347% 1,532 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 201
4K Mixed 80.2
280% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 682
DQ Write 1,152
DQ Mixed 873
674% 902 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 276%
Great: 298%
Jmicron Generic 500GB
346GB free
Firmware: 1214
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 377 387 381 387 142 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 412
Write 382
Mixed 351
SusWrite 344
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 38.4
4K Mixed 20.5
82% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 37.1
61% 117 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 91%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$69
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 127 130 133 132 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 107
Write 110
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 130
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 88%
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$120
1.5TB free
Firmware: 00.0NS05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 134 136 137 137 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 143
Write 145
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 136
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.9
198% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 96%
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB
378GB free
Firmware: SC23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 125 125 128 127 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 100
Write 108
Mixed 58.1
SusWrite 125
72% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
101% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 100%
JMicron Generic DISK02 8TB
7.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 164 165 165 167 166 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 249
Write 243
Mixed 188
SusWrite 164
280% 211 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.2
275% 7.87 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 80%
Generic Mass-Storage 8GB
7GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 6.8 6.8 6.6 6.7 7.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.09% Terrible
Read 19.7
Write 16.2
Mixed 18
SusWrite 7
20% 15.2 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.4
93% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 8.09%
Great: 10%
JMicron Generic DISK03 4TB
71GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 164 156 166 160 165 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 94.4
Write 88.7
Mixed 72.1
SusWrite 162
146% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 53%
JMicron Generic DISK01 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 1.1 0 0.6 0 0.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 155
Write 162
Mixed 39.9
SusWrite 0.4
107% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
106% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 71%
JMicron Generic DISK00 8TB
6.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.7 0 0.5 0 0.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 232
Write 241
Mixed 159
SusWrite 0.3
199% 158 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.2
270% 6.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 53%
Great: 76%
JMicron Generic DISK04 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 163 165 165 167 166 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 178
Write 132
Mixed 88.3
SusWrite 164
184% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
71% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 64%
WDC WD50 00AAKB-00H8A0 500GB
465GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 36.5
Write 38.3
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 34.1
48% 35 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.8% Good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 26.2
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 25.7
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 27.1
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS M Builds (Compare 8,282 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 AORUS M - $87

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $372
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback