Gigabyte GA-Z370-HD3.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics24% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370-HD3.  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateApr 03 '22 at 09:35
Run Duration363 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 70
1-Core 84
2-Core 134
58% 95.9 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 467
44% 368 Pts
64-Core 552
34% 552 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24% Poor
Lighting 29.6
Reflection 34.8
Parallax 28
24% 30.8 fps
MRender 33.5
Gravity 29.3
Splatting 26
24% 29.6 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD40EJRX-89T1XY0 4TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 76 75 84 90 89 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 54% Great: 104%
Hitachi HUS72403CLAR3000 3TB
41GB free
Firmware: C370
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 88.5
Write 33.8
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 21.9
34% 46.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
122% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 61%
Hitachi HUS72403CLAR3000 3TB
1TB free
Firmware: C370
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 33 32 29 34 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 122
Write 41
Mixed 42.8
SusWrite 33.8
44% 60 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
105% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 61%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 3TB
0GB free
Firmware: 0104
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8.5
Write 17
Mixed 11.3
9% 12.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
87% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 107%
Hitachi HUS72303CLAR3000 3TB
194GB free
Firmware: C1D8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 36 36 36 36 35 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 140
Write 43.3
Mixed 51
SusWrite 35.6
50% 67.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 96%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB
22GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 40.2
Write 38
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 21.4
42% 32.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
37% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 54%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
17GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 39.5
Write 38
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 21.3
43% 32.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
30% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 61%
USB3.0 high speed 2TB
22GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 129 126 130 129 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
48% Average
Read 92.5
Write 98.5
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 129
130% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 48%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 04CB 04CB 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.7% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 18.6
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 16.3
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 101
39% 101 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370-HD3. Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370-HD3.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback