Gigabyte Z790 AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 200%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 126%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 234%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 130%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics156% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive271% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte Z790 AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory21.7 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230606
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '23 at 02:58
Run Duration362 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700K-$310
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Memory 90.8
1-Core 227
2-Core 454
133% 257 Pts
4-Core 907
8-Core 1,712
156% 1,310 Pts
64-Core 3,089
191% 3,089 Pts
Poor: 120%
This bench: 130%
Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
156% Outstanding
Lighting 232
Reflection 212
Parallax 206
189% 217 fps
MRender 199
Gravity 154
Splatting 137
131% 164 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 156%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS500G3XHC-00SJG0 500GB
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 789 458 452 428 422 426 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
271% Outstanding
Read 1,962
Write 2,258
Mixed 1,677
SusWrite 496
359% 1,598 MB/s
4K Read 52.7
4K Write 252
4K Mixed 82.5
319% 129 MB/s
DQ Read 1,641
DQ Write 1,281
DQ Mixed 1,428
1,077% 1,450 MB/s
Poor: 184%
This bench: 271%
Great: 288%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4146 4150 4160 4098 4149 4105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
603% Outstanding
Read 3,698
Write 4,131
Mixed 2,885
SusWrite 4,135
838% 3,712 MB/s
4K Read 74.7
4K Write 269
4K Mixed 107
393% 150 MB/s
DQ Read 1995
DQ Write 1,689
DQ Mixed 1857
1,387% 1,847 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 603%
Great: 623%
Sabrent SB-ROCKET-NVMe4-1TB 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: RKT4B5.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3416 3458 3472 3475 3465 3463 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
482% Outstanding
Read 2,088
Write 3,255
Mixed 2149
SusWrite 3458
622% 2,738 MB/s
4K Read 57.9
4K Write 309
4K Mixed 96.2
375% 154 MB/s
DQ Read 1,899
DQ Write 1,394
DQ Mixed 1,770
1,290% 1,688 MB/s
Poor: 205%
This bench: 482%
Great: 482%
Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB
249GB free
Firmware: RKT30Q.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 806 126 189 146 129 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1,440
Write 1,551
Mixed 1,254
SusWrite 253
252% 1,125 MB/s
4K Read 56.8
4K Write 286
4K Mixed 91.9
356% 145 MB/s
DQ Read 755
DQ Write 1,238
DQ Mixed 120
338% 704 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 226%
Great: 305%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
723GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 169 170 169 170 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 171
Mixed 98.8
SusWrite 168
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
229% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5 6400 C36 2x16GB-$110
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
196% Outstanding
MC Read 82.6
MC Write 76.2
MC Mixed 72.9
221% 77.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.6
SC Write 51.6
SC Mixed 34.1
105% 36.8 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 131%
This bench: 196%
Great: 206%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 47 144 27" 1280 720 GSM5B7F LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical GA-Z790 AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 9,460 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 291%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 346%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z790 AORUS ELITE AX - $205

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $1,561
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback