Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD7-B3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics74% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive42.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z68X-UD7-B3  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '23 at 09:22
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 38%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 102
2-Core 173
73% 122 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 273
30% 234 Pts
64-Core 277
17% 277 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$225
MSI(1462 8D94) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74% Very good
Lighting 92.3
Reflection 93.1
Parallax 86.3
75% 90.6 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 80.6
Splatting 74.1
72% 90 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 000F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 82 45 38 39 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 348
Write 154
Mixed 189
SusWrite 53.4
41% 186 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 40
4K Mixed 13.7
66% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 23.7
44% 87 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 74%
Ct1000mx 50 1TB
738GB free
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 90 111 126 141 141 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 291
Write 164
Mixed 204
SusWrite 118
43% 194 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 38.4
4K Mixed 32
106% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 127
106% 156 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 115%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$106
276GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 82 82 83 85 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 90.9
Write 82.1
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 82.1
58% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$47
400GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 131 130 133 133 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 118
Write 130
Mixed 79.9
SusWrite 132
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 114%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
52GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 101 102 103 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 74
Write 50.7
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 102
55% 74.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 110%
WD A DT01A External 1TB
343GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 20 19 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 51.5
Write 29.5
Mixed 27.6
SusWrite 19.6
39% 32 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
26% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13%
Great: 19%
HGST HTS 545050A7E380 500GB
386GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.2 0.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.2% Very poor
Read 53.3
Write 29.8
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 0.2
32% 27.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
44% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 10%
HGST HTS 725050A7E630 500GB
16GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.2% Very poor
Read 53.3
Write 30.6
Mixed 30
SusWrite 0
33% 28.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
49% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 10%
FUJITSU MHW2160BH PL 160GB
118GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.2 2.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.6% Terrible
Read 50.7
Write 29.7
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 2.5
31% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
40% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.6%
Great: 10%
TOSHIBA MK1255GSX H 120GB
112GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 16 17 18 18 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.4% Very poor
Read 52.5
Write 30.6
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 17.2
38% 31.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
41% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
55.9% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 17.8
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 17.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 24" 1280 720 BNQ7917 BenQ E2420HD
Typical GA-Z68X-UD7-B3 Builds (Compare 102 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD7-B3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $471
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback