Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD7-B3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics71.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z68X-UD7-B3  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120221
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateAug 22 '23 at 10:48
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 106
2-Core 192
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 521
51% 416 Pts
64-Core 535
33% 535 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$225
MSI(1462 8D94) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.6% Very good
Lighting 88.4
Reflection 86.3
Parallax 81.8
72% 85.5 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 78.6
Splatting 73.1
71% 88.8 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 000F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 75 80 78 47 43 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36% Below average
Read 278
Write 123
Mixed 149
SusWrite 66.5
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 11.5
52% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 22.6
43% 85.5 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 36%
Great: 74%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$106
96GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 63 62 65 63 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 73.9
Write 61.6
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 62.1
46% 62.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$47
400GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 130 133 133 132 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 122
Write 107
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 132
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 114%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
52GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 101 96 100 99 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 41% Great: 110%
WD A DT01A External 1TB
369GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 50.6
Write 27.9
Mixed 23.6
SusWrite 19.1
37% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
25% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 19%
HGST HTS 545050A7E380 500GB
386GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.4% Terrible
Read 52.5
Write 27.8
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 0.2
31% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
37% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.4%
Great: 10%
HGST HTS 725050A7E630 500GB
16GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0 0 0.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.62% Terrible
Read 51.7
Write 28.6
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 0
31% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
45% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.62%
Great: 10%
FUJITSU MHW2160BH PL 160GB
118GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 2.7 2.7 3.1 2.8 3.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
8.68% Terrible
Read 51.9
Write 26.6
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 2.9
29% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.6
27% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 8.68%
Great: 10%
TOSHIBA MK1255GSX H 120GB
112GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 18 17 16 18 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13% Very poor
Read 52.1
Write 28.6
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 17.1
37% 30.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
37% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.3% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 17.2
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 24" 1280 720 BNQ7917 BenQ E2420HD
Typical GA-Z68X-UD7-B3 Builds (Compare 102 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD7-B3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $471
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback