Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200428
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 29 '23 at 22:21
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 79.1
1-Core 137
2-Core 260
87% 159 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 822
81% 661 Pts
64-Core 1045
65% 1045 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Zotac(19DA 4500) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 172
Parallax 0.2
133% 112 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 145
Splatting 126
123% 154 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 124%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB
492GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0317A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 3.5 4 3.9 3.5 3.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 461
Write 429
Mixed 342
SusWrite 52.6
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 99.8
4K Mixed 31.1
135% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 48.2
93% 181 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 101%
WD A DT01A External 1TB
621GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 35 35 36 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 50.9
Write 35
Mixed 33.3
SusWrite 35.3
50% 38.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
72% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 19%
WD My Book 1140 1.5TB
1TB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 69 73 70 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
27% Poor
Read 69.9
Write 73.3
Mixed 34.6
SusWrite 70.8
83% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27%
Great: 45%
WDC WD10 EURX-63UY4Y0 1TB
531GB free, PID 0475
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 38 39 39 39 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.9% Very poor
Read 36.8
Write 37.8
Mixed 33
SusWrite 38.8
50% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
103% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TD48G26S819-VC CL17-17-17 D4-2400 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72% Very good
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 28.8
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 26.4
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5B44 MP59HT
Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,930 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $425
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback