Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B650 AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 199%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive326% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B650 AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230607
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateJul 26 '23 at 02:26
Run Duration523 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$487
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 79.9
1-Core 215
2-Core 430
124% 242 Pts
4-Core 825
8-Core 1,610
144% 1,218 Pts
64-Core 3,792
235% 3,792 Pts
Poor: 104%
This bench: 117%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7600
Sapphire(1DA2 E448) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.7.1
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
129% Outstanding
Lighting 150
Reflection 183
Parallax 273
122% 202 fps
MRender 200
Gravity 185
Splatting 212
164% 199 fps
Poor: 56%
This bench: 129%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
733GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2129 2249 2262 2106 865 862 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
326% Outstanding
Read 2,070
Write 2,329
Mixed 1,625
SusWrite 1,745
438% 1,942 MB/s
4K Read 54.5
4K Write 257
4K Mixed 50.8
284% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 777
DQ Write 1,610
DQ Mixed 619
634% 1,002 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 326%
Great: 352%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$63
520GB free
Firmware: 42A4SANA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1427 991 992 993 988 992 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
315% Outstanding
Read 2,514
Write 1,767
Mixed 266
SusWrite 1,064
310% 1,403 MB/s
4K Read 60.5
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 89.3
310% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,259
DQ Write 1,168
DQ Mixed 559
599% 995 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 315%
Great: 372%
WD WD80EAZZ-00BKLB0 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 186 187 187 187 188 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 183
Mixed 112
SusWrite 186
123% 167 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.8
324% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 108%
Great: 117%
External USB3.0 DISK00 4TB
3.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 41 40 43 41 43 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.9% Average
Read 169
Write 172
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 42.3
145% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
136% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 58%
External USB3.0 DISK01 4TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 87 86 83 82 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.3% Average
Read 119
Write 120
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 84.9
127% 96.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
129% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 60%
External USB3.0 DISK02 4TB
3.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 41 40 43 41 43 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.7% Average
Read 168
Write 176
Mixed 73.9
SusWrite 42.3
145% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
136% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 43%
External USB3.0 DISK03 4TB
3.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 41 40 43 41 43 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.8% Below average
Read 149
Write 152
Mixed 83.3
SusWrite 42.3
136% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 37%
External USB3.0 DISK04 5TB
210GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 80.5
Write 88.8
Mixed 36.5
85% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 0.6
268% 2.8 MB/s
External USB3.0 DISK02 3TB
815GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 64 60 59 60 63 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 102
Write 104
Mixed 82
SusWrite 61
116% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
112% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 62%
External USB3.0 DISK01 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 64 60 59 60 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 144
Write 117
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 61.1
130% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 70%
External USB3.0 DISK00 3TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.1 0 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 160
Write 162
Mixed 125
SusWrite 0
142% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 67%
External USB3.0 DISK04 4TB
389GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 83.6
Write 84.3
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 0
69% 55.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
108% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 64%
External USB3.0 DISK03 3TB
340GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 84.5
Write 87.6
Mixed 59.4
SusWrite 0
73% 57.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
61% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 65%
External USB3.0 DISK03 2TB
16GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 57 55 59 57 57 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33% Below average
Read 108
Write 112
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 57.4
117% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
75% 1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33%
Great: 45%
External USB3.0 DISK00 3TB
7GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 12 11 12 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.2% Poor
Read 87.5
Write 88.6
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 11.3
82% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 46%
External USB3.0 DISK02 3TB
10GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 12 11 12 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.1% Very poor
Read 73.2
Write 76.1
Mixed 39
SusWrite 11.2
63% 49.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
26% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 53%
External USB3.0 DISK03 4TB
8GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 10 12 11 12 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24% Poor
Read 98.1
Write 98.1
Mixed 83.9
SusWrite 11.5
94% 72.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
116% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 24%
Great: 37%
External USB3.0 DISK04 3TB
44GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 12 11 12 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.2% Poor
Read 76.4
Write 78
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 11.3
76% 58.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
102% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 32%
External USB3.0 DISK01 2TB
71GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 0.1 0 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.8% Very poor
Read 63.8
Write 65.2
Mixed 39.4
SusWrite 0
53% 42.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
108% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 54%
External USB3.0 DISK02 2TB
398GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 0.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.4% Very poor
Read 68
Write 68.8
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 0
64% 50 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
71% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 52%
External USB3.0 DISK04 2TB
14GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 89.4
Write 69.5
Mixed 85.2
103% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
75% 1 MB/s
External USB3.0 DISK01 2TB
110GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 41 49 42 49 45 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.8% Poor
Read 92
Write 93.8
Mixed 78.4
SusWrite 45.5
103% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
71% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 54%
External USB3.0 DISK00 1TB
32GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 55 59 57 57 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.7% Poor
Read 64.4
Write 65.2
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 57.3
83% 60.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
71% 0.93 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF556C40-32 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
161% Outstanding
MC Read 58.7
MC Write 57.2
MC Mixed 59.7
167% 58.5 GB/s
SC Read 45.6
SC Write 62.9
SC Mixed 50
151% 52.8 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 140%
This bench: 161%
Great: 204%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 30 34.1" 1280 720 GSM7770 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical GA-B650 AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 797 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 413%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 419%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B650 AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $2,560
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback